The Offical Rock Band 3 Thread

[thebocaj]

I bet we as a community could make a better setlist if we didn't try.

If we didn't try, we'd have no setlist though. Or is that what you're getting at?

[aander91]

I bet we as a community could make a better setlist if we didn't try.

Once again, you've caused a 12 acre rainforest to shrivel up and die and you've murdered thousands upon thousands of children by posting. It's not a bad setlist by any means. Just because it doesn't appeal to you (or even me somewhat) doesn't mean it's a bad setlist and that they didn't put a lot of thought and time into making it. Plus, they can't just "make" a setlist like we can. For us, any song is available. This is completely different for them since they have to get the rights and permissions and whatnot. I'm sure it's a long drawn out process, and for you to say that we could make a better setlist without even trying is just ignorant. That's like saying "I bet a Jet can go faster that a rowboat!"

[slashfan7964]

That is very true. I mean, instead of recharting songs, you'd think they'd pick some new ones.

[raynebc]

That is a very simplistic view, as usual. There are plenty of new things they can add that weren't available in the original chart. I don't play Rock Band often, but even I can think of several songs I wish they'd redo just so I can practice them in pro-mode.

[aander91]

That is very true. I mean, instead of recharting songs, you'd think they'd pick some new ones.

What the hell is wrong with you? Where did I say that at all? I never even came close to saying that. Did you even read my post? Or were you just agreeing with me so that I wouldn't connect your posting with the holocaust next time?

[slashfan7964]

Nevermind. I agreed to what you said, then I posted a statement.

[vedicardi]

That is very true. I mean, instead of recharting songs, you'd think they'd pick some new ones.

yeah it's not like they didn't have the actual original song, keyboards, drums, bass guitar, vocals, vocal harmonies, and pro mode for all instruments in GH1 among countless other features like band multipliers for scores. all those features were in the first GH game, why remake them?

[thebocaj]

That is very true. I mean, instead of recharting songs, you'd think they'd pick some new ones.

yeah it's not like they didn't have the actual original song, keyboards, drums, bass guitar, vocals, vocal harmonies, and pro mode for all instruments in GH1 among countless other features like band multipliers for scores. all those features were in the first GH game, why remake them?

Wow. GH1 is entering my shopping list now! lol jk I don't have money anyway

[slashfan7964]

They didn't, but they don't need to remake what was done again. All they are doing is adding stuff. As said before, better off releasing those repeats as DLC and choosing different songs for in-game.

[vedicardi]

Yeah put smoke on the water as DLC rather than on disc because it was in GH1 that's pretty smart

this applies to all repeats

[amak11]

That is very true. I mean, instead of recharting songs, you'd think they'd pick some new ones.

If you knew thw differences between the covers and the originals, then you wouldnt count them as recharts.

[aander91]

That's the LEAST of their motivations, I can assure you.

[amak11]

Anyways, so anyone as excited as i am for RB3. As i plan to pre-purchase it next month (along with GH), this game...hell, both games will exciting to play.

[drihscol]

gh will be good maybe to rip 2112 off of.
yes i'm freaking excited for rb3.

[RedShadow]

Brb, selling a kidney to buy the Fender Stratocaster and the game.