GTA V Confirmed, Trailer Nov 2nd, Set for L.A.

[crazy.neo]

GTA V: Economical Crisis in da' hood

[RedShadow]

IS THAT CLAUDE? maybe?

[vedicardi]

nope

[RedShadow]

Tommy Vercetti?

[amak11]

Probly some random antagonist that gets screwed over by a protagonist and he must kill that person to beat the game <-- same plot to every GTA game

[slashfan7964]

Probly some random antagonist that gets screwed over by a protagonist and he must kill that person to beat the game <-- same plot to every GTA game

This is true.

[aander91]

Wait isn't the protagonist the good guy? Like if you antagonize someone you're trying to pick a fight.

[RedShadow]

The protagonist is always the MC, no matter what his intentions are.
In this sense, what amak said doesn't make any.

[aander91]

Just like the good old days.

[slashfan7964]

And Rockstar is still silent. Maybe we'll actually get some decent news at Gamescon in August. I hope they take their sweet time though, I'm tired of rushed games getting released and then either totally sucking or then adding in content later as paid DLC that should have been in the game to start with. I can't say GTA V will fall in the same fate but I sure hope it's at least not rushed. Here's hoping for the best Grand Theft Auto yet.

[Jama7301]

Gonna have to go a long ways to beat San Andreas.

Also, I heard the DLC for GTA IV was really good. The fact that it's also standalone earns high marks for me. Lost and the Damned came out almost a year after the core game, and the Ballad of Gay Tony even later.

So I don't see why someone can cry that those were paid content and not in the core game after that sort of time frame. It's not like it was On-Disc or Release Day DLC

[slashfan7964]

Gonna have to go a long ways to beat San Andreas.

Also, I heard the DLC for GTA IV was really good. The fact that it's also standalone earns high marks for me. Lost and the Damned came out almost a year after the core game, and the Ballad of Gay Tony even later.

So I don't see why someone can cry that those were paid content and not in the core game after that sort of time frame. It's not like it was On-Disc or Release Day DLC

I agree San Andreas was by far the best of the series, with Vice City coming in a close second. I have faith though after the let down of GTA IV that Rockstar might get this one right. After all, they are one of the few developers out there that actually listen to what their customers have to say.

Yes, the DLC was really good. I have both, and I must say, they were better than the core game itself. However they still don't live up to what GTA: SA had, and, this is why some people including myself think the V is going to be the best of the series. At this point, Rockstar knows what people want and what works, and if they get it wrong, it's only going to spell disaster for the company.

Never bothered me. I ended up getting them on Episodes from Liberty City at a later date however. I really enjoyed the fact that they were tied into the main storyline itself, made things interesting.

[crazy.neo]

>by far
>close second

Vice City was the best, though. Fark San Andreas.

Oh, word censor, did I trigger you? Sorry about that, Kant.

[slashfan7964]

>by far
>close second

Vice City was the best, though. Fark San Andreas.

Oh, word censor, did I trigger you? Sorry about that, Kant.

I don't agree. San Andreas had a sheer amount of more things to do and I enjoyed the story more. Both games are fantastic for sure though. The only thing I didn't like about Vice City was that it forced you to do side missions for the story, and some of the were great, but I didn't llike that they were required. They would have been better if they were part of the story and not side missions.