RF-mod 2.0 - electric boogaloo

W2k · Postby **W2k** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:21 pm

Great! There always needs to come a time when you stop adding features and focus on polish - and for most software projects, the sooner the better.

whatakevin · Postby **whatakevin** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:10 pm

yay glad to hear RF mod 3 is almost out. so did u decide to abandon HOPO cuz of the next FOF or not?

Rogue_F · Postby **Rogue_F** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:10 pm

angelkillou · Postby **angelkillou** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:30 pm

yeah!! iÃ‚Â´m very interesting in play your rf mod 3.0
When it will be available?

dinki · Postby **dinki** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:56 pm

angelkillou wrote:When it will be available?

Although I am a FoF newbie, I can answer this from years of seeing similar posts on other projects. The answer is always the same:

It will be ready when it is ready and not a second earlier.

angelkillou · Postby **angelkillou** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 6:52 pm

jajajaj I hope that in this case you do not have reason xD

whatakevin · Postby **whatakevin** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:32 pm

i hear that the new FoF is coming out soon so their HOPO may be superior to yours if yours doesnt release 1st

DarknessBR · Postby **DarknessBR** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:07 am

And it's been released :p

How long should we expect for a new RF version? I haven't installed the new FoF version yet because I bet it won't support the lastest RF version...

Rogue_F · Postby **Rogue_F** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:09 am

I've already looked at their version in the earlier SVN if you look at another thread.

Their HOPO was missing a few things. It also does not have the HOPO/pluck detection everyone has complained about. That was one of the things I worked pretty hard to try to fix (although it is not perfect).

I will probably release 3.0 soon (it will be for the previous version) before I work on 4.0 which will just be a port to the new version (as much as I can).

While I think my HOPO are better, I'd rather use their code for it because mine is very hacky. But I can improve the algorithm.

-Alex

dsk · Postby **dsk** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 4:53 pm

where to download rfmod 2.96?

whatakevin · Postby **whatakevin** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:10 pm

dsk wrote:where to download rfmod 2.96?

omfg why did u have to bring this thread up again? theres another RF mod thread thats being used now for RF discusion. there simply IS NO RF-MOD 2.96 that i know of. if there is, READ THE SEARCH TUTOURIAL!!

jake2k3 · Postby **jake2k3** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:18 pm

2.96 is a version of RF Mod that is undergoing development. Most people that make large projects, such as RF Mod and FoF, number there versions as they update them. RF's not going to release it though, because it's still in development.

For example, look at FoF. You had 1.1.324, then you had 1.2.438. There never was any 1.1.323-1.2.438, that would be ridiulous if you had a bajillion versions of something, and who would take the time to download every single one?

You get the picture? I hope so.
~Jake2k3

whatakevin · Postby **whatakevin** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:13 pm

lol makes no scence to make decimal versions... why not just 1,2,3,4...? you dont see nintento going from mario party 5 to mario party 5.564.

Air Guitar Hero · Postby **Air Guitar Hero** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:56 pm

not to the public anyway. Commercial games go through many different builds as well.

jake2k3 · Postby **jake2k3** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:54 pm

whatakevin wrote:lol makes no scence to make decimal versions... why not just 1,2,3,4...? you dont see nintento going from mario party 5 to mario party 5.564.

Because FoF's numbers don't exactly stand for decimals. I don;t know how they number them, but it could go something like version.volume.sub-volume. For example the newest release is Version 1, Volume 2, Sub-volume 438.

But that's just an example, cahnces are it doesn't stand for that.

RF-mod 2.0 - electric boogaloo

Shredder

Shredder

Who is online